Legislature(2007 - 2008)
2008-04-02 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2008-04-02 Senate Journal Page 2584 SB 221 Senator Therriault moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 34. Senator Ellis objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 34 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 221(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 34 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Dyson, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Nays: Cowdery, Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Green, Hoffman, Huggins, Kookesh, McGuire, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Thomas, Wielechowski and so, Amendment No. 34 failed. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 221(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. Senator Therriault moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 35. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Therriault offered Amendment No. 35 : DEPARTMENT: STATEWIDE ADD: Statewide annual and deferred maintenance appropriations to Section 10 of CSSB221(FIN) am for each department. Administration $7,868,000 GF $2,500,000 PBF Corrections $8,178,000 GF Fish and Game $2,900,000 GF 2008-04-02 Senate Journal Page 2585 Health and Social Services $750,000 GF $7,600 Federal Receipts Labor and Workforce Development $6,886,000 GF Military and Veterans Affairs $7,142,000 GF $960,515 Federal Receipts Natural Resources $6,388,000 GF Transportation and Public Facilities $14,423,000 GF University $20,242,948 GF Sec. 11: Make Conforming Fund Source Shifts and Total Agency Adjustments. Sec. 24, page 98, Delete lines 1 through 2. Senator Therriault moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 35. Senator Stevens objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 35 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 221(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 35 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Dyson, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Nays: Cowdery, Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Green, Hoffman, Huggins, Kookesh, McGuire, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Thomas, Wielechowski and so, Amendment No. 35 failed. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 221(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. 2008-04-02 Senate Journal Page 2586 Amendment No. 36 was not offered. Senator Therriault moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 37. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Therriault offered Amendment No. 37 : DEPARTMENT: Department of Revenue Add the following appropriation to section 10: APPROPRIATION: AHFC Senior Citizens Housing Development Program ADD: $6,000,000 AHFC Dividend 1139 Sec. 11: Make Conforming Fund Source Shifts and Total Agency Adjustments. Sec. 24, page 98, line 1: Delete "75,000,000" Insert "69,000,000" Senator Therriault moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 37. Objections were heard. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 37 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 221(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 37 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Dyson, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Nays: Cowdery, Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Green, Hoffman, Huggins, Kookesh, McGuire, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Thomas, Wielechowski and so, Amendment No. 37 failed. 2008-04-02 Senate Journal Page 2587 CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 221(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. Senator Bunde moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 1. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Bunde offered Amendment No. 1 : Agency: Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development Grants to Named Recipients: Sultana Homeowner's Assn. Project: Sultana Homeowner's Association, Inc. Sultana Drive Maintenance and Safety Improvements House District 32 Amount: $15,000 Funding Source: General Funds (1004) Senator Bunde moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 1. Senator Ellis objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 221(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Bunde, Dyson, Therriault, Wilken Nays: Cowdery, Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Green, Hoffman, Huggins, Kookesh, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Thomas, Wielechowski Absent: McGuire, Wagoner and so, Amendment No. 1 failed. 2008-04-02 Senate Journal Page 2588 CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 221(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. Senator Bunde moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 2. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Bunde offered Amendment No. 2 : Agency: Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development Grants to Municipalities Anchorage Project: Anchorage - Bluebell Drive at Goldenview Drive/Intersection Safety House District 32 Amount: $600,000 Funding Source: General Funds (1004) One-time need Senator Bunde moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 2. Senator Ellis objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 221(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Bunde, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Nays: Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Ellis, Elton, French, Green, Hoffman, Kookesh, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Thomas, Wielechowski Absent: Huggins, McGuire and so, Amendment No. 2 failed. 2008-04-02 Senate Journal Page 2589 CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 221(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. Senator Bunde moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 3. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Bunde offered Amendment No. 3 : Agency: Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development Grants to Municipalities Anchorage Project: Anchorage - Goldenview Drive Connection Study - South to Potter Valley Road House District 32 Amount: $900,000 One-time need Funding Source: General Funds (1004) One-time need Senator Bunde moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 3. Senator Ellis objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 221(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 4 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Bunde, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Nays: Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Ellis, Elton, French, Green, Hoffman, Kookesh, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Thomas, Wielechowski Absent: Huggins, McGuire 2008-04-02 Senate Journal Page 2590 and so, Amendment No. 3 failed. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 221(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. Senator Bunde moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 4. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Bunde offered Amendment No. 4 : Agency: Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development Grants to Municipalities: Anchorage Project: Anchorage-Hillside Transportation Safety and Connectivity: Mountain Air Drive/Hillside Drive Extension House District 32 Amount: $4,500,000 One-time need Funding Source: General Funds (1004) One-time need Senator Bunde moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 4. Senator Ellis objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 221(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Bunde, Dyson, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Nays: Cowdery, Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Green, Hoffman, Huggins, Kookesh, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Thomas, Wielechowski Absent: McGuire 2008-04-02 Senate Journal Page 2591 and so, Amendment No. 4 failed. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 221(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. Senator Bunde moved that the bill be returned to second reading for the purpose of a specific amendment, that being Amendment No. 5. Without objection, the bill was returned to second reading. Senator Bunde offered Amendment No. 5 : Agency: Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development Grants to Municipalities Anchorage Project: Anchorage - Yosemite Drive Area Drainage House District 32 Amount: $500,000 One-time need Funding Source: General Funds (1004) One-time need Senator Bunde moved for the adoption of Amendment No. 5. Senator Ellis objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 221(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 5 NAYS: 15 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Dyson, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Nays: Cowdery, Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Green, Hoffman, Huggins, Kookesh, McGuire, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Thomas, Wielechowski 2008-04-02 Senate Journal Page 2592 and so, Amendment No. 5 failed. CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 221(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. Senator French rose to point of order. President Green cautioned members to proceed in order. The question being: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 221(FIN) am "An Act making and amending appropriations, including capital appropriations, supplemental appropriations, and appropriations to capitalize funds; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 221(FIN) am Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Dates YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Cowdery, Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Green, Hoffman, Huggins, Kookesh, McGuire, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Thomas, Wielechowski Nays: Bunde, Dyson, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 221(FIN) am passed the Senate. Senator Ellis moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clauses. Without objection, it was so ordered. Senator Therriault gave notice of reconsideration. Reconsideration of Senate Bills SB 221 Senator Ellis moved and asked unanimous consent that the reconsideration on CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 221(FIN) am "An Act making and amending appropriations, including capital appropriations, supplemental appropriations, and appropriations to capitalize funds; and providing for an effective date" be taken up at this time. Senator Therriault objected. 2008-04-02 Senate Journal Page 2593 The question being: "Shall the reconsideration be taken up on the same day?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 221(FIN) am Take up Reconsideration? YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Cowdery, Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Green, Hoffman, Huggins, Kookesh, McGuire, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Thomas, Wielechowski Nays: Bunde, Dyson, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 221(FIN) am was before the Senate on reconsideration. The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 221(FIN) am "An Act making and amending appropriations, including capital appropriations, supplemental appropriations, and appropriations to capitalize funds; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 221(FIN) am Third Reading - On Reconsideration Effective Dates YEAS: 15 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Cowdery, Davis, Ellis, Elton, French, Green, Hoffman, Huggins, Kookesh, McGuire, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Thomas, Wielechowski Nays: Bunde, Dyson, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 221(FIN) am passed the Senate on reconsideration. Senator Ellis moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on reconsideration be considered the vote on the effective date clauses. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.